Sign In

Category: Suprem Court

[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.

The Indian Lawyers and Human Rights Activists Association has filed a complaint before the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, seeking appropriate action, including prosecution in […]

अरविंद केजरीवाल, मनीष सिसोदिया सहित 23 आरोपियों को आरोपमुक्त (डिस्चार्ज) करने का विवादित आदेश पारित करने वाले राउज़ एवेन्यू सीबीआई विशेष न्यायाधीश श्री जितेंद्र सिंह के विरुद्ध आपराधिक अभियोजन, तत्काल निलंबन तथा अवमानना कार्यवाही की मांग करते हुए शिकायत दायर की गई है।

शिकायत में विशेष न्यायाधीश श्री जितेंद्र सिंह के विरुद्ध  भारतीय न्याय संहिता (BNS) की धाराएँ 256, 257 और 198, अवमानना अधिनियम, 1971 की धाराएँ 2(b), […]

अरविंद केजरीवाल, मनीष सिसोदिया यांच्यासह 23 आरोपींना आरोपमुक्त (डिस्चार्ज) करण्याचा वादग्रस्त आदेश देणारे राऊज अव्हेन्यू सीबीआय विशेष न्यायाधीश श्री जितेंद्र सिंह यांच्या विरोधात फौजदारी खटला, तात्काळ निलंबन तसेच न्यायालयाचा अवमान (Contempt) कारवाईची मागणी करत तक्रार दाखल करण्यात आली आहे।

तक्रारीत विशेष न्यायाधीश श्री जितेंद्र सिंह यांच्या विरोधात भारतीय न्याय संहिता (BNS) कलमे 256, 257 आणि 198, अवमानना अधिनियम 1971 मधील कलमे 2(b), 12 आणि […]

Supreme Court Two-Judge Bench Findings Contrary to Nine-Judge Bench in K.S. Puttaswamy (2017) Spark Nationwide Debate on Can judgments of the Supreme Court itself violate the fundamental rights of citizens— and What Remedies Exist [ Maryamma Josh v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 113 of 2026 , order dated 13.02.2026].

Many larger benches and Nine-judge Constitution Bench ruling in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017), has affirmed the law that the judgments of the […]

The Supreme Court rule permitting dismissal of a review petition without hearing and without recording reasons is unconstitutional, as it violates fundamental rights, denies fair procedure, and disregards the caution expressed by the Seven-Judge Constitution Bench.

Various Bar Association wrote CJI to struck down Order XLVII Rule 3 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Earlier, in Prem Chand Garg v. Excise […]

[FACT-CHECK] Whether the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) can conduct an inquiry against Hon’ble Justices Sh. Vikram Nath and Sh. Sandeep Mehta in terms of the directions laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ram Deo Chauhan v. Bani Kanta Das, (2010) 14 SCC 209, with respect to alleged violations of the fundamental rights of advocates, Smt. Menka Gandhi, and others?

(I) Whether the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) can conduct an inquiry against Hon’ble Justices Sh. Vikram Nath and Sh.  Sandeep Mehta in terms of […]

बार कौन्सिलच्या त्या सदस्यांना उच्च न्यायालयाचा दणका – सनद रद्द होण्याची शक्यता

बार कौन्सिलचे सदस्य, काही वकील किंवा वकील संघटना जर ठराव पास करून, अथवा अप्रत्यक्षरीत्या इतर वकिलांवर दबाव टाकून एखाद्या व्यक्तीची केस स्वीकारू नये असे सांगत […]