Godrej May Face Perjury, Forgery and Massive Damages Action as the order restoring development rights was passed with the consent of the society members and […]
मुंबई उच्च न्यायालयाच्या रशीद खान पठाण यांच्या याचिकेमध्ये पारीत आदेशाने आरटीओ बदली रॅकेट प्रकरणात मोठी खळबळ
संबंधित न्यायालयाने रशीद खान पठाण आणि इतर साक्षीदारांनी त्यांच्या अर्जामध्ये उपस्थित केलेल्या सर्व मुद्द्यांवर संपूर्ण विचार करून ‘Witness Protection Scheme’ अंतर्गत सर्व साक्षीदारांच्या संरक्षणासाठी योग्य […]
Fact Check: False, Misleading and Distorted Information Circulated by the Chairman of Azad Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Regarding the Directions Given by the Hon’ble High Court — What Actually Happened in Court and the Serious Legal Consequences for Dishonest Litigants
It has been brought to notice that a false, misleading, and distorted message is being circulated by Mr. Deepak Warang, purportedly in the name of […]
Breaking: Using Fake or Non-Existent Material in Judicial Orders Is Gross Misconduct by the Judge— Supreme Court took cognizance and warns serious Legal Consequences.
Court issued notices to the Attorney General of India, the Solicitor General of India, and the Bar Council of India. The development gains further significance […]
![[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.](https://youngadvocatescouncil.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/IMG-20260307-WA0016.jpg)
[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.
The Indian Lawyers and Human Rights Activists Association has filed a complaint before the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, seeking appropriate action, including prosecution in […]
[Breaking] Defiance of Supreme Court Orders — No Longer Contempt? A Controversial Order with shocking proposition by the Bench of Justice B.V. Nagarathna in Apparent Conflict with the Constitution Bench Judgment in Re: C.S. Karnan (2017) 7 SCC 1 .
A shocking verdict that has sparked widespread condemnation and concern across the legal fraternity and the judicial community. A Bench comprising Hon’ble Justice Smt. B.V. […]
दिल्ली शराब नीति केस: क्या दिल्ली की अदालतों में बढ़ रही है ‘ज्यूडिशियल इंडिसिप्लिन’?
कई मामलों में सुप्रीम कोर्ट और हाई कोर्ट के आदेशों की अवहेलना करने पर दिल्ली की निचली अदालतों के न्यायाधीशों के खिलाफ अदालत की अवमानना […]
Delhi Judges Under Scanner for Flouting Supreme Court and High Court Directions — Kejriwal Liquor Case Order Adds to Growing Concern
A pattern of judicial indiscipline in Delhi’s subordinate courts has come under renewed scrutiny following the discharge order passed by CBI Special Judge Jitendra Singh […]
दिल्ली शराब कमिशन घोटाले पर बड़ा सवाल! जनता के ₹338 करोड़ कौन लौटाएगा? जनता के ₹338 करोड़ वापस करो — केजरीवाल, सिसोदिया और आम आदमी पार्टी की संपत्ति जब्त करो. राष्ट्रीय संविधान रक्षा समिति ने राष्ट्रपति को सौंपा विस्तृत संवैधानिक प्रतिवेदन
नई दिल्ली: राष्ट्रीय संविधान रक्षा समिति ने दिल्ली आबकारी नीति 2021–22 से संबंधित कथित अनियमितताओं के मामले में ₹338 करोड़ से अधिक की नागरिक (सिविल) […]
दिल्ली दारू कमिशन घोटाळ्यावर मोठा सवाल! जनतेचे ₹338 कोटी कोण परत करणार? जनतेचे ₹338 कोटी परत द्या — केजरीवाल, सिसोदिया आणि आम आदमी पार्टीची मालमत्ता जप्त करा. राष्ट्रीय संविधान रक्षा समितीकडून राष्ट्रपतींकडे सविस्तर घटनात्मक निवेदन
नवी दिल्ली : दिल्ली आबकारी धोरण 2021–22 प्रकरण आता केवळ राजकीय वाद उरलेले नाही — तर थेट जनतेच्या पैशांचा प्रश्न बनला आहे. राष्ट्रीय संविधान रक्षा […]