सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाने Binding Precedents यांना “कायदेशीर पुरावा” (Legal Evidence) आणि कायद्याचा अधिकृत स्रोत (Authoritative Source of Law) म्हणून मान्यता दिल्यानंतर, अशा कृत्यांमुळे भारतीय न्याय संहिता, […]
Tag: justice
Suppression or Withholding of Binding Precedents Favouring the Opposite Party, and Reliance on Overruled Judgments, Is Not Merely a Matter of Professional Misconduct and Criminal Contempt. The Supreme Court’s Recognition of Binding Precedents as Legal Evidence Raises the Applicability of Sections 230, 231 and 246 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Carrying Punishment of Imprisonment Up to Seven Years Relating to Suppression of Legal Evidence, Fabrication and Use of False Evidence, and Dishonestly Making False Claims Before a Court, Punishable with Imprisonment Up to Seven Years. [M/s Eminent Colonizers Private Limited v. Rajasthan Housing Board & Ors., 2026 SCC OnLine SC 148; Kusha Duruka v. State of Odisha, (2024) 4 SCC 432; Samson Arthur v. Quinn Logistic India Pvt. Ltd., 2015 SCC OnLine Hyd 403]
Adv. Nilesh Ojha-Sanvidhani, Chairman , Indian Bar Association. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has repeatedly held, and most recently in M/s Eminent Colonizers Private Limited v. […]
Binding precedents constitute legal evidence – Supreme Court’s guidelines on mandatory prosecution of advocates, senior advocates and litigants suppressing binding precedents in favour of the opposite party: a decisive judicial intervention to curb frivolous litigation, perjury, contempt and gross professional misconduct at the bar.
Legal Analysis and Summary By – Adv. Nilesh Ojha-Sanvidhani, Chairman Indian Bar Assocaition. (M/s Eminent Colonizers Private Limited v. Rajasthan Housing Board & Ors., 2026 […]
Why Recusal Applications Alleging Personal Bias, Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, or Judicial Disqualification Must Be Determined by Another Judge, and Why Failure to Follow This Rule Vitiates the Proceedings.
A Critical and Important Principle of Natural Justice and Judicial Impartiality Often Overlooked, Misunderstood, or Insufficiently Addressed in Judicial Proceedings An Analysis of Blondine Surratt, […]
आप ‘जस्टिस’ नहीं बल्कि ‘दलाल’ हैं; अपने नाम के आगे से ‘जस्टिस’ हटाइए और उसकी जगह ‘दलाल’ लिखिए!” — उद्धव ठाकरे गुट के प्रवक्ता संजय राउत की वर्तमान एवं पूर्व मुख्य न्यायाधीशों सहित देश के सभी न्यायाधीशों के प्रति चौंकाने वाली, बेलगाम और संविधान-विरोधी मांग
सभी न्यायाधीशों पर, विशेष रूप से भारत के वर्तमान मुख्य न्यायाधीश न्यायमूर्ति सूर्यकांत तथा पूर्व मुख्य न्यायाधीश न्यायमूर्ति भूषण गवई, न्यायमूर्ति संजीव खन्ना, न्यायमूर्ति उदय […]
“न्यायाधीशांनो, तुम्ही ‘जस्टिस’ नाही, तर ‘दलाल’ आहात; नावापुढील ‘जस्टिस’ काढून टाका आणि ‘दलाल’ हे संबोधन लावा!” – उद्धव ठाकरेंचे प्रवक्ते संजय राऊतांची विद्यमान आणि माजी सरन्यायाधीशांसह देशाच्या सर्व न्यायाधीशांना धक्कादायक, बेताल आणि घटनाविरोधी मागणी
सर्व न्यायाधीशांवर, विशेषतः भारताचे विद्यमान सरन्यायाधीश न्यायमूर्ती सूर्यकांत तसेच माजी सरन्यायाधीश न्यायमूर्ती भूषण गवई, संजीव खन्ना, उदय यू. ललित यांच्यावर संजय राऊत यांचे बेछूट आरोप […]
“CALL YOURSELVES ‘DALAL’, NOT ‘JUSTICE’: SANJAY RAUT’S SHOCKING DEMAND TO SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT JUDGES, INCLUDING THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA”
He Sent a Public Message to All Judges That They Must Stop Using the Prefix “Justice” Before Their Names and Replace It With “Dalal” — […]
Complaint Filed Against Two NCLT Members Alleging Wilful Disregard of Binding Supreme Court Precedents to Shield Accused Litigant and their Advocate from Serious Charges of Fraud Upon the Court
Complaint Against members Shri K. R. Saji Kumar, and Shri Anil Raj Chellan, Alleges Selective Protection, Fact-Twisting, Judicial Favouritism and Nexus Between Bench Members and […]
BREAKING | Delhi-based social activist and YouTuber Gulshan Pahuja has moved the President of India seeking criminal prosecution against three Delhi High Court judges, alleging judicial fraud, dishonesty, manipulation of court records, criminal conspiracy, abuse of judicial authority, and wilful disregard of binding Supreme Court precedents. [Case No: PRSEC/E/2026/ /0038577]
Pahuja maintains that his affidavit-backed complaint is founded on court records, documentary evidence, and digital proof, which, cannot be contradicted by any court. He states […]
दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट के तीन जजों पर राष्ट्रपति को शिकायत — सोशल एक्टिविस्ट ने लगाए न्यायिक धोखाधड़ी, रिकॉर्ड में हेरफेर और संविधान के उल्लंघन के गंभीर आरोप — सीबीआई जाँच व आपराधिक मुकदमे की अनुमति, अटॉर्नी जनरल द्वारा सुप्रीम कोर्ट में अवमानना का मुकदमा दायर करने, जस्टिस यशवंत वर्मा की तर्ज पर तीनों जजों से न्यायिक काम वापस लेने, तथा याचिकाकर्ता के मौलिक संवैधानिक अधिकारों के हनन के एवज में उचित मुआवज़ा की माँग [Case No: PRSEC/E/2026/ /0038577]
दिल्ली के सोशल एक्टिविस्ट और यूट्यूबर गुलशन पाहुजा की अवमानना सज़ा में गंभीर कानूनी भूल — सज़ा देने वाले जज खुद कठघरे में – सुप्रीम […]